Saturday, March 31, 2007

COLUMN: Lots of Rainy Days and Chuck


By Tobin Barnes
Stick with me. This is eventually going to lead to Chuck. So here goes:

Other night, lightening and thunder woke me up about three o’clock. That’s always fairly shocking. Almost like a nightmare. Even more shocking when it’s the end of March.

But the ensuing rain was welcome. And not just because we really need it here in western SoDak. I like rain anytime. Don’t get enough of it. I’ve always liked rainy days.

I don’t even mind rainy Saturdays. Good things must have happened to me on rainy Saturdays when I was a kid. Can’t remember any of them, but that’s one explanation.

Another might be genetic. Perhaps appreciation for gray, drizzly, dreary days has been inbred—northern European roots and all. Cold, gray, and soggy for untold generations...don’t know any other way to react than to be happy about it.

Sometimes I think I’m living in the wrong part of the country. Be better off in the Pacific Northwest with rain much of the year—Seattle, Tacoma—or in nice and cool northern California—San Francisco.

But then maybe a lot of what I like would be too much.

Mark Twain said the coldest winter he ever spent was summer in San Francisco. That’s a great ironic twist on words, but I know what he’s talking about. I’ve been there in the summertime.

Sometimes during the day, it was downright cold. Wet, chills-to-the-bone cold. Weird for July.

I still enjoyed the place, though. But again, that’s me.

From what I understand, other times of the year can be pretty gray and chilly, too. Except in the fall. That’s when they supposedly get their nice weather.

But to heck with the fall, I’m going back again this spring. Not sure it’s a recommended time. It might be gray and wet and dreary. Right up my alley...maybe. We’ll see.

I’m going with Chuck. A lot of people wouldn’t recommend that either, if’n they know Chuck. Of course, our wives are going along, too, and that will deflect the impact somewhat. Still, Chuck is necessarily going to be the focal point of the trip. In other words, if Chuck is with you, you never forget he’s there.

Chuck says we’re brothers-in-law because our wives are sisters. I always maintain that’s more of a coincidence than any kind of family bond.

But don’t get me wrong. I like Chuck. Kinda like a moth drawn to a flame.

I’ve talked about Chuck many times before.

He’s the guy we invited to an anniversary party of ours at a restaurant. He ordered two entrees—half a chicken and a slab of ribs. My brother, who was there also, thought Chuck was a nut. Other people do, too.

He’s the guy the police were looking for in Breckenridge, Colorado. The APB told the cops to look for a red-haired adult male wearing an orange hospital shirt that said “Bellevue Psychiatric Ward” on the back. What he was wearing was the factual part. The rest was an innocent mix up, mostly.

He’s the guy who when I visited his house took me over to his new art print hung on the wall. Then he took it off the nail and showed me the back side. The price sticker was still on it. Said “$400.” I said “Wow!”, not realizing he was such an art lover. He said, “I added another zero.”

Chuck’s got the gift of gab. He’s a little-old-lady magnet at weddings and funerals. I’m not that big a talker myself. This juxtaposition of him and me can work pretty well for a few hours. But this San Francisco trip’s gonna last five days. I could be a basket case by the end of it.

Yeah, so here’s the deal. I like rainy days, but do I like a ton of rainy days? And I like Chuck, but do I like a ton of Chuck.

Those are both good questions.

Monday, March 26, 2007

PARODY: Steve Jobs and the All-New I-Rack

MADtv takes a swipe at Steve Jobs, Apple Computer, and George Bush's policy in Iraq--all at once. (Sent by Roy Wilson)

Sunday, March 25, 2007

VIDEO: Hillary and 1984

Here's that Hillary Clinton video you may have heard about that makes her the Big Brother of the famous 1984 commercial, plus some commentary that puts it into perspective.

powered by performancing firefox

SLIDESHOW: Smokey Bear Nation

An interesting look at how animals have been used to teach lessons to children.

powered by performancing firefox

VIDEO: He May Be DUI, but He's Nimble

(Sent in by Roy Wilson)

COLUMN: I Don't Get It


By Tobin Barnes
So I’m watching CBS news the other night, and the lead-off topic is the war in Iraq—yeah, kinda like every other night. And kinda like when I was a kid and Vietnam led off most broadcasts.

Except back during Vietnam, they’d have a little tote board on the TV screen, like they were keeping score. Nice and convenient, I suppose, but repulsive at the same time.
Maybe it was to let us know we should feel somewhat less miserable than the other side.

But on this recent night I’m talking about, things were special because it was the four-year anniversary of the Iraq invasion. Now with anniversaries, you either love ’em or hate ’em. Know what I mean?

This one comes in the latter category, whatever your political persuasion. Everybody’s at least a little disappointed with the duration of this conflict, don’t you think? Ask George Bush to fess up, he’d tell you.

Nevertheless, the anchor reported an opinion poll that said 29% of Americans think the war in Iraq is going well. And I’m sitting there thinking, “What in the heck are they smoking?”

Not that I’m looking to denigrate others’ opinions, but that’s my opinion. What alternate universe are they living on?

Going well as opposed to what?

Maybe things’ll be going well next week, next month, or next year, but you’re telling me they’re going well now?

Usually, my schtick isn’t the political scene. It’s more along the lines of irony. But, heck, 29% thinking things are going well in Iraq is disturbingly ironic.

They must be privy to some enlightening information I haven’t seen. Must be classified. Evidently they’re not giving it out to the non-Fox News public because they’re afraid the country will implode in terminal glee.

Either that, or maybe the 29% has some eternal optimism gene the rest of us missed out on. Find themselves walking around humming, “The sun will come out tomorrow...” while the rest of us are just a bunch of grinches.

So, as you can see, I don’t get it. It’s mostly the same information, but evidently two ways of looking at it. Someone’s missing the boat big time.

Maybe the two sides are utilizing different filters. Bush supporters filter out the bad stuff, thinking most of the news is pretty darned good...considering we’re operating in a 3rd world country with a 13th century mindset.

Meanwhile, Bush detractors filter out the good stuff, thinking most of the news is pretty darned awful...considering it was “Mission Accomplished” not long after the beginning of the whole convoluted mess.

Weird. Are our opinions shaping the politics or are the politics shaping our opinions?

A little later in the broadcast some talking head’s saying that if things work out well—like, you know, best case scenario?—we’ll be able to reduce troop numbers some time next year to the 40-60,000 level. And heck, that sounds nice—well, at least better—even though we’ve heard this before.

Except there’s a catch. The head keeps talking. Says we’ll have to maintain that level of commitment for maybe a generation or two. And “I almost swallowed my gum,” as my mother likes to say.

Maintain 40-60,000 troops in a virtually alien culture for another 20-40 years? For what reason? To stop them from using weapons of mass destruction, bring democracy to the middle east, fight them over there so we don’t have to fight them over here, keep a civil war from breaking out?

And lately they’re saying it will only get a lot worse if we leave. Gees, the rationale changes every time you change your oil. You need a scorecard.

It’s like we’re Br’er Rabbit stuck to Tar Baby. Like forever.

So, as I said, I don’t get it.

I guess I’m one of the 71%.

We don’t think things are going well. Have they ever?

The Ethicist: Police Report

Laugh Lines: Jay Leno and Conan O’Brien

LETTERMAN: Top Ten Signs You've Been Watching Too Much College Basketball

I particulary like number 1.

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Hillary in 2008

If you don't like Hillary, you'll like this parody, but then, I kinda like Hillary, and I still like this parody. (Sent by Roy Wilson)

Saturday, March 17, 2007

COLUMN: As Time Goes By


By Tobin Barnes
Three things came together lately. Made me a little more aware than I used to be. Didn’t take much.

First, we had been covering the Great Depression in my U.S. history classes. Then I made a trip to my hometown of Mitchell, S.D., for my mother’s 84th birthday. And finally, somewhere on that trip, it dawned on me that my dad, had he lived, would now be in his 90’s.

So what’s up with all that?

Well, plenty, if you’re me.

It’s shocking enough to be 54, soon to be 55—try it some time, or maybe you already have. But add to that your mother’s 84th birthday and the fact that your father was seven years older than your mother. And now we’re talking time going by.

I can’t imagine my dad in his nineties. My mother, yes. And hopefully it will be so. But my dad? Complete impossibility.

You see, he took very poor care of himself. But it’s an oft-told story: didn’t exercise, smoked two-three packs a day (as did all too many of his generation), and didn’t have healthy eating habits.

Making it into his nineties would have been a pipe dream. His relatively early death was not unexpected. He died at 63, a little more than eight years from where I am now.

Does that portend anything for me? Maybe, maybe not.

But my life and my parents’ lives have been radically different. They grew up when times were
tough. What that cost them, especially my dad, is anybody’s guess.

I try to impress upon my students just how tough the 30’s were, but I never come close.

Neither my generation nor theirs has the slightest idea of the hardships. Even imagination fails. But still I try.

At least I’m only one generation removed. I’ve heard the stories first hand. Most of my students, on the other hand, would have to go back to great-grandparents, if still alive, for the same story-telling experiences.

My mother’s family was relatively lucky. They lived on a farm in eastern South Dakota. They produced their own food. Always had plenty to eat.

Nevertheless, it was a near thing.

With 13 children—some trying to establish themselves on their own farms—my grandfather went heavily into debt trying to keep himself, his sons, and even some of his neighbors from failure. The ground was so dry and the air so full of dust, they often fed thistle to the cattle to keep them going. Luxuries, beyond a full plate, were small to insignificant, thereby relatively great whenever they did come along. And this went on week after week, month after month, year after year.

Bleak. Disheartening.

But my dad’s family had it much worse.

On our rides around Mitchell, my dad would point out all the places his family had lived...and then had been thrown out of. Their diet wasn’t good—mostly carbohydrates. He’d talk about taking syrup sandwiches to school for lunch. His mother would send him down to the tracks—they always lived near the tracks, the poor side of town—to pick up random pieces of coal that had fallen off the trains. Coal needed to heat the house. Best time of the year was Christmas when charities brought them some extra food.

My dad moved out of the house at 14. It lightened the load somewhat. But he was nevertheless lucky in a way. He was athletic. Locals interested in sports took an interest in him, kept him playing so he was able to graduate from high school, unlike his brothers and sisters. None of them got that opportunity.

Still it must have been difficult. He lived in the local druggist’s basement doing odd jobs for him as repayment and for a time in the basement of a mortuary where he worked. Yeah, a high school student in a mortuary.

Again, how all this affected my parents is anybody’s guess. Even probably for them. Yet, needless to say, effects there must have been.

For example, my dad’s early poverty and dislocation may have affected how he later took care of himself and even thought of himself. What he experienced in the tough times wasn’t really an upbringing. It was a scramble.

He probably never learned to eat properly when food was scarce. Anything was good enough. And he smoked like a chimney maybe because like for all WWII soldiers cigarettes were part of the regular rations.

Makes you wonder...when maybe you hadn’t wondered before.

VIDEO: Church Bloopers

(Sent by Roy Wilson)

VIDEO: Amazing Juggle Finale

Particularly if you like the Beatles. (Sent by Roy Wilson)

Ten Peeves that Dogs Have About Humans -- PetVR.com

(Sent by Ann Lichter)

Sunday, March 11, 2007

VIDEO: Most Dangerous Comedian

(Sent in by Roy Wilson)

VIDEO: Bush on Bush

"April 29, 2006 at the 2006 White House Correspondents Dinner, President Bush invited a Bush impersonator named Steve Bridges to share the dais with him. The premise was that the impersonator was interpreting Bush's words with what he really meant. A 20-second sound and video bite hit the newscasts, but this is the whole enchilada." (Sent in by Roy Wilson)

http://video.google.com:80/videoplay?docid=-1921276117304287501&q=genre:

COLUMN: Juggling on down the Road


By Tobin Barnes
As I write--and I mean exactly that--I am making the great trek across the plains of South Dakota.

Again.

I was back to see relatives east river and am now headed west river. Have made this trip well over a hundred times.

Uh huh, thank you. I appreciate your sympathy.

But though the wounds are indeed grievous, they are all self-inflicted. It’s the price paid for having been born and raised in eastern SoDak and then discovering life somewhere over the rainbow in the hills.

Lo, through the years, the veritable inches, feet, and yards of grassland in between have become painfully etched in my mind. I have become all-too-well acquainted with certain hillocks, the odd tree in the odd dry wash, and even some fence posts. They all know me, and I, alas, know them.

Nevertheless, it’s an uneasy relationship I have with these landmarks. They sadly sense, I think, my haste to be beyond them.

Ah yes, thoughts of the traveler recorded stream of consciousness style via a laptop plugged into a cigarette lighter through an adapter. I am now officially a scribe of the modern age. What a wonder, huh?

Not only am I getting from place to place, but I’m doing it without the mindless, zombie-like stupor of mile after mile of pretty much the same. (Tourism office representatives would strenuously disagree, of course, but the rest of us native South Dakotans readily admit it. Only the most starry-eyed of plains poets could cover the distance in between with any semblance of delight.)

Oh, and before I go any further, I should tell you that I’m NOT driving AND writing, though some workaholics might make that assumption. No, my wife is handling the car. So rest assured, my manic need to communicate has not yet gone quite that far.

However, I’m not putting such a mind-boggling juxtaposition of tasks past others,.

You’ve gotta know there’s quite a few A-types out there who’d like nothing better than to be noodling through their sales figures or list of contacts while flying along at seventy-five miles per hour. Heck, that might even be happening in the next car up the road.

Yeah, look. See that guy. He just swerved. Could very well be. Maybe not on a laptop, though that’s within the realm, but certainly on a cell phone.

It’s called multi-tasking. People pride themselves in it.

They’re fending off wasted time behind the wheel while accomplishing something else. Merely transporting themselves from one place to another has never been enough. More needs to be done.

It started with food. After all, who can’t drive one hand on the wheel, the other on a Big Mac with wad of burger in the mouth? Ketchuppy pickles end up on the lap, but what the hey. We’re making time.

So let’s try makeup. Not me, necessarily, but maybe you. The random pothole while applying lipstick might add an inconvenient sneer to the day, but gees, it’s progress.

Now, let’s give Aunt Marge a call. See what she’s doing. You end up laughing and carrying on so much you hardly hear the people honking.

Maybe text messaging would be better. Look at the road, punch in a letter, look at the road, punch in a letter: “W-H-A-T C-H-A D-O-I-N-G?”

“NOT MUCH. HOW BOUT CHU?”

“N-O-T M-U-C-H”

Next thing you know, you look over at the other car, and some clown in the passenger seat’s typing out his column on a laptop.

What an idiot! Should be watching the road, looking around, getting to know the hillocks and the odd tree.

THE ETHICIST: Online Extracurriculars

Sunday, March 4, 2007

COLUMN: Women Incubating Next Great Plague?


By Tobin Barnes
I’ve always held women in high esteem.

Average man vs. average woman? No contest.

Women have always epitomized for me what’s right with the world. If anything, my problem’s been putting women too high up on a pedestal, and that’s not necessarily good. Heck, who wants to be an idealized statue?

But I’ve got to admit that my opinions have recently been shaken. And all it took to revise my decades-old way of thinking was an article in USA Today, titled “Who’s dirtier, men or women?”

Of course, on first notice of such an article, the no-brainer choice has got to be men. As we all have, I’ve encountered some dirty, smelly, disgusting men in my day. If this weren’t a family newspaper with high standards, I’d go into specifics. Nevertheless, dear reader, your own unappetizing encounters with certain males of even limited acquaintance will surely suffice for plenty of examples of my point.

And it’s not just bodily uncleanliness we’re talking about. Think of the pig sties men will live in if given their druthers, perhaps myself included during some of my more disorderly bachelor days.

All that being established, you’ve got to know, as I knew, that with a headline like “Who’s dirtier, men or women?” the shocking answer has got to be...women.

So how’s that possible, knowing the sexes as we do?

First off, according to a new research report, our office desks are busy blooming much more bacteria than the office lavatory. The article says that “the average office desktop has 400 times more bacteria than the average office toilet seat.”

That’s right, we’re slaving away in a cesspool, most assuredly of our own making. Secondly, women’s office cesspools are swarming with more unwanted life than men’s.

“Women have three to four times the number of bacteria in, on and around their desks, phones, computers, keyboards, drawers and personal items as men do,” the study by University of Arizona professor Charles Gerba showed. That’s information gleaned by Gerba’s analysis of 100 offices on the Arizona campus.

Like us, Gerba began his study with the assumption that men’s work spaces, unkempt hogs that we are, would be germier than women’s. And on the surface, women’s desks appear neater and cleaner, despite all the knick-knacks typical of feminine environs, but get out the microscope and there’s a minefield of contagious critters.

That’s because “women have more interactions with small children and keep food in their desks,” Gerba says. “The other problem is makeup.”

Evidently, cosmetics and lotions are “prime germ-transfer agents.” And “Makeup cases also make for fine germ homes, along with phones, purses and desk drawers.”

I guess it’s a good thing men prefer to present themselves au naturale. Seems we instinctively knew that all that primping wasn’t healthy.

And how about all that food squirreled away in the desk? Gerba discovered that 75% of women are quietly stashing munchies, a major source of bacterial growth.

“I was really surprised how much food there was in a woman’s desk,” he said. “If there’s ever a famine, that’s the first place I’ll look for food.”

On the other hand, a man’s bacteria magnet is his wallet. Oh yeah, it’s those bloated toads we’ve carried around for decades that once resembled fine grained leather. They’re busily housing the next great plague.

“It’s in your back pocket where it’s nice and warm, it’s a great incubator for bacteria,” Gerba says. That’s right. Our backsides are not only often unattractive, they are assiduously hatching our demise.

The solution? Gerba advises regular use of a hand sanitizer to mop up desk tops and adjacent surfaces. That’ll cut down the bacteria scourge by 25%.

Well, sounds good, I guess.

But you think men are going to be sanitizing much for only a 25% improvement? Not bloody likely when they’ll still probably be cleaner than the merry maid next desk over.

VIDEO: The Angry Chicken

THE ETHICIST: The Phone Ranger

Classes for Men

Jeannie thought this was funny, but I don't get it. (Sent in by Pam Gillespie.)

SPRING CLASSES FOR MEN
REGISTRATION MUST BE COMPLETED
By March 10th 2007

NOTE: DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY AND DIFFICULTY LEVEL OF THEIR CONTENTS, CLASS SIZES WILL BE LIMITED TO 8 PARTICIPANTS MAXIMUM.

Classes begin March 12, 2007

Class 1
How To Fill Up The Ice Cube Trays --- Step by Step, with Slide Presentation.
Meets 4 weeks, Monday and Wednesday for 2 hours beginning at 7:00 PM.

Class 2
The Toilet Paper Roll --- Does It Change Itself?
Round Table Discussion.
Meets 2 weeks, Saturday 12:00 for 2 hours.

Class 3
Is It Possible To Urinate Using The Technique Of Lifting The Seat and
Avoiding The Floor, Walls and Nearby Bathtub? --- Group Practice.
Meets 4 weeks, Saturday 10:00 PM for 2 hours.

Class 4
Fundamental Differences Between The Laundry Hamper and The Floor ---
Pictures and Explanatory Graphics.
Meets Saturday at 2:00 PM for 3 weeks.

Class 5
After Dinner Dishes --- Can They Levitate and Fly Into The Kitchen Sink?
Examples on Video.
Meets 4 weeks, Tuesday and Thursday for 2 hours beginning at 7:00 PM.

Class 6
Loss Of Identity --- Losing The Remote To Your Significant Other.
Help Line Support and Support Groups.
Meets 4 Weeks, Friday and Sunday 7:00 PM.

Class 7
Learning How To Find Things --- Starting With Looking In The Right Places
And Not Turning The House Upside Down While Screaming.
Open Forum .
Monday at 8:00 PM , 2 hours.

Class 8
Health Watch --- Bringing Her Flowers Is Not Harmful To Your Health.
Graphics and Audio Tapes.
Three nights; Monday, Wednesday, Friday at 7:00 PM for 2 hours.

Class 9
Real Men Ask For Directions When Lost --- Real Life Testimonials.
Tuesday at 6:00 PM Location to be determined.

Class 10
Is It Genetically Impossible To Sit Quietly While She Parallel Parks?
Driving Simulations.
4 weeks, Saturday noon, 2 hours.

Class 11
Learning to Live --- Basic Differences Between Mother and Wife.
Online Classes and role-playing .
Tuesday at 7:00 PM, location to be determined.

Class 12
How to be the Ideal Shopping Companion
Relaxation Exercises, Meditation and Breathing Techniques.
Meets 4 weeks, Tuesday and Thursday for 2 hours ! Beginning at 7:00 PM.

Class 13
How to Fight Cerebral Atrophy --- Remembering Birthdays, Anniversaries and Other Important Dates and Calling When You're Going To Be Late.

Cerebral Shock Therapy Sessions and Full Lobotomies Offered.
Three nights; Monday, Wednesday, Friday at 7:00 PM for 2 hours.

Class 14
The Stove/Oven --- What It Is and How It Is Used.
Live Demonstration.
Tuesday at 6:00 PM, location to be determined.

Upon completion of any of the above courses, diplomas will be issued to the survivors.

Saturday, March 3, 2007

Answers in the Style of...Take Your Pick

Just ran across this. Don't know the origins (from somewhere in cyberspace), but I couldn't help but post it:
Why Did the Chicken Cross the Road?

Douglas Adams: Forty-two.

Mohammed Aldouri (Iraqi ambassador): The chicken did not cross the road. This is a complete fabrication. We don't even have a chicken.

Aristotle: To actualize its potential.

George W. Bush: We don't really care why the chicken crossed the road. We just want to know if the chicken is on our side of the road or not. The chicken is either with us or it is against us. There is no middle ground here.

Bill Clinton: I did not cross the road with THAT chicken. What do you mean by chicken? Could you define chicken, please?

Darwin: Chickens, over great periods of time, have been naturally selected in such a way that they are now genetically dispositioned to cross roads.

Einstein: Whether the chicken crossed the road or the road moved beneath the chicken depends upon your frame of reference.

Emily Dickinson: Because it could not stop for death.

Freud: The fact that you are at all concerned that the chicken crossed the road reveals your underlying sexual insecurity.

Bill Gates: I have just released the new Chicken Office 2000, which will not only cross roads, but will lay eggs, file your important documents, and balance your checkbook.

Grandpa: In my day, we didn't ask why the chicken crossed the road. Someone told us that the chicken had crossed the road, and that was good enough for us.

Hemingway: To die. In the rain.

Carl Jung: The confluence of events in the cultural gestalt necessitated that individual chickens cross roads at this historical juncture, and therefore synchronicitously brought such occurrences into being.

Martin Luther King, Jr.: I envision a world where all chickens will be free to cross roads without having their motives called into question.


Timothy Leary: Because that's the only kind of trip the Establishment would let it take.

Karl Marx: It was a historical inevitability.

Agent Mulder: You saw it cross the road with your own eyes. How many more chickens have to cross the road before you believe it?

Friday, March 2, 2007

Competition? Not Really a Fight, It's a Beating

Recently, I posted a link to a Rapid City Journal story about how nurses at Rapid City Regional feel about their crocs and quite a few other things. This Journal story (below) is about how people feel as to higher teachers' salaries that can be found a few miles away in Wyoming. Once again, the comments tell as much or more as the original story. Scroll down after the story.

powered by clipmarks

The Idyllic Little Town of Seaside

Jeannie and I have visited this newly quaint planned community on the Florida panhandle not far from Destin. Got out, walked around the neighborhoods--nice. The architecture of each house echoes the houses next to it, but there's enough differentiation in each design to keep the whole place interesting. Some of the houses are directly on the white sandy beaches which are a major draw for the area. A neighboring planned community, called Watercolor (if I remember correctly) is built adjacent to Seaside. You can buy or you can rent, though both would be fairly expensive.
clipped from www.slate.com
Architecture: Seaside, Revisited
powered by clipmarks